| Errors | Missing | Unverified | Supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
In Satyajit Ray’s The Big City (Mahanagar), the setting of 1950s/60s Calcutta is not merely a backdrop but a relentless force that dictates the characters' survival, their moral choices, and the ultimate trajectory of the plot.
The setting influences the action through the following specific ways:
The film begins in a cramped, lower-middle-class apartment in Calcutta. Ray famously described the set as "the smallest rooms ever built."
The city’s infrastructure, specifically its tram system, serves as a bridge between Arati's domestic world and her public life.
The physical layout of the city—its stairs, elevators, and balconies—mirrors the characters' social aspirations.
The "Big City" setting provides a social diversity that wouldn't exist in a rural or suburban environment.
The film ends with Arati and Subrata looking out over the vast, sprawling city from a high vantage point.
The summary missed the crucial symbol of the lipstick, which represents Arati's modernization and is a major source of conflict with her husband.
The summary omitted Bani, the younger sister-in-law, who is a key supporter of Arati and represents the younger generation's acceptance of change.
The summary missed the subplot involving the son, Pintu, whose neglect/reaction to his mother working adds emotional weight to the 'pressure cooker' aspect.
In Satyajit Ray's The Big City (Mahanagar), the setting of 1950s Calcutta acts as a catalyst for the protagonist Arati's transformation. The cramped domestic space ('the smallest rooms ever built') forces her outward due to financial necessity. The city's infrastructure, particularly the trams, facilitates her transition to the public sphere and serves as a space for private conversation with her husband. The verticality of the city (stairs/elevators) mirrors social mobility, contrasted with the father-in-law's physical fall down a staircase, symbolizing the decline of the old patriarchal order. The diverse workspace introduces Arati to Edith, an Anglo-Indian colleague, whose unjust firing prompts Arati's resignation—a moral stance made possible by her urban exposure. The film ends not with a high vantage point, but with the couple merging into the street-level crowd, the camera tilting up to a street lamp, symbolizing their solidarity amidst the city's uncertainty.