← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/10/2026 // SUBJECT: Sleepers (1996) Plot Analysis Processing: 6m 11.2s
Source: Gemini 2.0 Flash
Analysis: gemini-3-flash-preview
Timeline Analysis: Narrative: Yes | External: No
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
3 3 0 2
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film Sleepers (1996), what actions start the plot in motion?

#T NARRATIVE TIMELINE

Act 1 - Setup
Four friends (Shakes, Michael, John, Tommy) grow up in Hell's Kitchen, 1967, running small errands for gangster King Benny and being mentored by Father Bobby.
The summary omits the context of their relationship with King Benny, which leads to the conflation error regarding the 'errand'.
Inciting Incident
Mentioned Context: Medium
The boys spontaneously decide to steal a hot dog cart from a vendor to eat the food and cause mischief.
The boys were not 'tasked' with this; it was a self-initiated prank/theft. Their primary goal was mischief and a 'feast' (eating the hot dogs), not necessarily selling them for profit.
"decide to steal a hot dog cart, planning to sell the dogs for a profit"
Inciting Incident (Outcome)
Mentioned
The heavy cart slips from their grip, rolls down the subway stairs, and critically injures an elderly man.
This is accurate.
"lose control of the cart and it rolls down the subway stairs, seriously injuring a man"
Act 1 - Consequence
The boys are sentenced to the Wilkinson Home for Boys, where the main plot of abuse begins.
The summary stops at the accident, omitting the sentencing which is the direct result of the actions described.

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

The film begins with four young boys – Shakes, Michael, John, and Tommy – living in Hell's Kitchen. One summer day, they are tasked with a seemingly simple errand: to get some hot dogs. On their way, they decide to steal a hot dog cart, planning to sell the dogs for a profit. However, things go horribly wrong when they lose control of the cart and it rolls down the subway stairs, seriously injuring a man.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] The film follows Lorenzo 'Shakes' Carcaterra, Michael Sullivan, John Reilly, and Thomas 'Tommy' Marcano in Hell's Kitchen.
[2] The boys were not 'tasked' with an errand by anyone. They were hanging out on a hot day and decided to pull a scam on a vendor to get free food.
[3] The boys did not plan to sell the hot dogs for profit. They initially wanted to steal hot dogs to eat, and then impulsively decided to steal the cart as a prank.
[4] The cart rolled down the stairs of a subway entrance and crushed a man named James Caldwell, which is the inciting incident of the film.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

High
Sentencing to Wilkinson Home for Boys

The AI summary stops at the injury, missing the fact that the boys are sent to a reformatory where they suffer the abuse that drives the entire second and third acts of the film.

Medium
The specific 'scam' involving Shakes

The AI omits that the theft was a coordinated effort where Shakes distracted the vendor by running away, which explains why the cart was left unattended.

Medium
The prank of balancing the cart

The boys didn't just lose control while walking; they were intentionally balancing the cart on the edge of the subway stairs to trick the vendor into grabbing it, which is why it fell.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What happens to the boys at the Wilkinson Home for Boys?
#02 How do the boys get revenge as adults in Sleepers?
#03 Is the story of Sleepers actually based on a true story?

#S SOURCES

spoilertown.com fandom.com wikipedia.org rogerebert.com ew.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)