← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/11/2026 // SUBJECT: Atragon (1963) Film Rating Processing: 44.0s
Source: Gemini 2.0 Flash
Analysis: gemini-3-flash-preview
Timeline Analysis: Narrative: Yes | External: Yes
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
0 4 0 6
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film Atragon (1963), what was the film rated (e.g. R, PG, G), and what elements of the film contributed to that rating?

#T NARRATIVE TIMELINE

Inciting Incident
Mentioned
The underwater Mu Empire reveals itself, causing earthquakes and sinking ships to threaten the surface world.
The summary correctly identifies the antagonist and the nature of the conflict.
"struggle against a militaristic underwater empire"
Rising Action
Captain Jinguji is discovered on a remote island, having built the super-submarine Gotengo (Atragon) to restore the Japanese Empire, initially refusing to help the world.
The summary omits the specific character arc of Captain Jinguji and the nationalist themes associated with the ship's origin.
Climax
Mentioned Context: Medium
The Gotengo launches and travels to the Mu Empire. The guardian dragon Manda attacks the submarine underwater.
In this film, Manda fights the submarine underwater and is frozen by the Absolute Zero Cannon. Manda does not destroy buildings or surface structures in this specific film; the Mu Empire's technology causes the city destruction.
"destruction caused by Atragon and Manda"
Resolution
Mentioned Context: Low
The Gotengo destroys the Mu Empire's power source, ending the threat. Captain Jinguji realizes the world is united.
The summary implies 'destruction' in a negative or chaotic sense (like collateral damage), whereas Atragon's destruction is a targeted military strike against the enemy base.
"destruction caused by Atragon"

#E EXTERNAL EVENTS TIMELINE

December 22, 1963
Released Mentioned
Original theatrical release of Atragon (Kaitei Gunkan) in Japan by Toho.
The film was released in Japan well before the US MPAA system existed.
"Atragon, being a Japanese film from 1963..."
March 11, 1965
Released
US theatrical release of Atragon by American International Pictures (AIP).
The US release also predated the MPAA rating system by over three years.
November 1, 1968
Event Mentioned
The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) film rating system is officially introduced.
This confirms the summary's claim that the film's release predated the rating system.
"The MPAA rating system wasn't introduced until 1968."
2005 / 2006
Released
North American DVD release by Media Blasters / Tokyo Shock.
This release is listed as 'Unrated' or 'Not Rated', supporting the summary's conclusion.
May 11, 2021
Released
Budget DVD release by Cheezy Flicks Entertainment.
Some retailers list this specific budget release with a 'G' rating, though this is likely a retailer default or self-applied rating rather than an official MPAA submission.

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

Atragon, being a Japanese film from 1963, was not subject to the modern MPAA rating system that we associate with film ratings today in the United States. The MPAA rating system wasn't introduced until 1968.

Therefore, Atragon did not receive a G, PG, or R rating.

Instead, films were generally classified by distributor preferences or by local censorship boards in various regions where they were shown.

In terms of content that might have influenced a potential rating had the modern system existed, Atragon contains:

Therefore, in today's rating system, it might potentially have received a PG or PG-13 rating, but it likely would have been rated G.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] Atragon was released in Japan in 1963 and the US in 1965, predating the 1968 MPAA system.
[2] The MPAA rating system (G, M, R, X) was officially launched on November 1, 1968.
[3] Because the system did not exist in 1965, the film was released as 'Unrated' or under the 'Approved' seal of the Production Code.
[4] The summary omits the Production Code Administration (PCA), which was the de facto national regulator in the US until 1968. Major distributors like AIP typically sought a PCA Seal of Approval.
[5] The film contains fantasy violence involving the Gotengo (Atragon) submarine and the sea dragon Manda destroying ships and cities.
[6] The narrative centers on a WWII captain's refusal to surrender and his battle against the Mu Empire, reflecting post-war Japanese political themes.
[7] The film was rated 'U' (Universal) by the BBFC in 1965, which is the direct equivalent of a 'G' rating. Most Toho sci-fi films of this era are rated 'G' on home video.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Medium
Production Code Administration (PCA) Seal of Approval

The AI failed to mention the PCA, which was the primary self-regulatory body in the US at the time of the film's 1965 release.

Low
BBFC 'U' Rating

The film received an official 'U' (Universal) rating in the UK in 1965, providing a concrete historical example of its classification.

Low
US Distributor: American International Pictures (AIP)

Identifying the US distributor provides context for how the film was marketed and censored for American audiences.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What were the specific cuts made to Atragon for its US theatrical release by AIP?
#02 How did the Production Code Administration view Japanese sci-fi films in the 1960s?
#03 What is the current MPAA rating for Atragon on streaming platforms like Max or Criterion Channel?

#S SOURCES

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)