#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION
Regarding the film Arrival (2016), how much did the film make at both the box office and after (detail breakdown), and how did that compare to its budget?
What the LLM said (errors and omissions annotated)
The film Arrival (2016) was a major financial and critical success, particularly notable for its "legs" (longevity in theaters) and high return on investment (ROI) for a non-franchise, cerebral science-fiction drama.
1. Financial Breakdown
The Budget
- Production Budget: $47 million.
- Marketing (P&A): While specific figures are rarely disclosed, industry estimates for a mid-budget film with an Oscar-season push like Arrival typically range from $25–$40 million. Paramount acquired the North American and Chinese distribution rights for $20 million at the Cannes Film Festival.
Box Office Performance
- Domestic (US & Canada): $100.5 million (approx. 49.5% of total).
- International: $102.8 million (some sources list up to $112.2 million including re-releases).
- Worldwide Total: $203.4 million (reaching as high as $212.8 million following subsequent re-releases).
Post-Theatrical (Home Media & Ancillary)
In the "after-market," Arrival continued to perform well due to strong word-of-mouth and its status as a "thinking person's" sci-fi film.
- Domestic Home Video Sales: Approximately $20.6 million in North America alone (breakdown: $14.2M from Blu-ray and $6.4M from DVD).
- Digital/VOD: While specific digital rental/purchase numbers are not public, it was a consistent top-performer on platforms like iTunes and Vudu throughout the 2017 awards season.
- Streaming/TV Rights: The film’s licensing deals with platforms (like Hulu and later Paramount+) and cable networks added significantly to its total revenue, though these private contracts are not publicly itemized.
2. Comparison to Budget & Profitability
Arrival is cited as a textbook example of a "prestige" hit because its earnings far exceeded the traditional industry "break-even" threshold (usually 2.5x the production budget).
| Metric |
Figure |
Notes |
| Budget-to-Box Office Ratio |
~4.3x |
A ratio of 4.3 indicates the film was highly profitable before home media. |
| Theatrical Multiplier (Legs) |
4.18x |
This measures its domestic total against its $24M opening. High multipliers (anything >3x) indicate strong word-of-mouth. |
| Distributor ROI (Paramount) |
High |
Paramount's $20M acquisition of US/China rights yielded a $100M+ domestic gross, making it one of their most efficient investments of 2016. |
3. Why it Succeeded Financially
- Efficient Production: Director Denis Villeneuve produced a visual scale that critics noted looked far more expensive than its $47M price tag (for comparison, Interstellar cost $165M and The Martian cost $108M).
- Awards Season Bump: The film was released in November and stayed in theaters for 17 weeks. After receiving 8 Academy Award nominations (including Best Picture), it was re-expanded into over 1,000 theaters in early 2017, generating a late-stage revenue surge.
- Counter-Programming: It served as a successful alternative for adult audiences during a season dominated by blockbusters like Doctor Strange and Fantastic Beasts.
#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)
[1] Production budget is consistently reported as $47 million.
[2] P&A costs are rarely public, but $25-40M is a standard industry estimate for a mid-budget wide release.
[3] Paramount acquired North American and Chinese rights for $20 million at Cannes 2014.
[4] Domestic gross was $100.5 million.
[5] International gross was $102.8 million.
[6] Worldwide total was $203.4 million.
[7] Box Office Mojo lists a lifetime gross of $212.8 million in some indices, likely accounting for re-releases.
[8] Domestic video sales totaled approximately $20.6 million.
[9] Blu-ray sales were ~$14.2M and DVD sales were ~$6.4M.
[10] The film has cycled through various streaming platforms (Epix, Hulu, Prime) since release. While licensing is a revenue source, the specific platforms mentioned may not reflect the current availability or the primary initial deal (which was likely Epix).
[11] Opening weekend was $24.1 million, yielding a multiplier of ~4.18x.
[12] Paramount did acquire China rights, but the film performed poorly there ($15.9M gross), meaning the 'High ROI' was almost entirely due to the US performance.
[13] The film received 8 Academy Award nominations.
#C RELATED QUERIES
#01 What was the specific box office gross of Arrival in China?
#02 Did Arrival win any of its 8 Oscar nominations?
The film *Arrival* (2016) was a major financial and critical success, particularly notable for its "legs" (longevity in theaters) and high return on investment (ROI) for a non-franchise, cerebral science-fiction drama.
### **1. Financial Breakdown**
#### **The Budget**
* **Production Budget:** **$47 million**.
* **Marketing (P&A):** While specific figures are rarely disclosed, industry estimates for a mid-budget film with an Oscar-season push like *Arrival* typically range from **$25–$40 million**. Paramount acquired the North American and Chinese distribution rights for **$20 million** at the Cannes Film Festival.
#### **Box Office Performance**
* **Domestic (US & Canada):** $100.5 million (approx. 49.5% of total).
* **International:** $102.8 million (some sources list up to $112.2 million including re-releases).
* **Worldwide Total:** **$203.4 million** (reaching as high as **$212.8 million** following subsequent re-releases).
#### **Post-Theatrical (Home Media & Ancillary)**
In the "after-market," *Arrival* continued to perform well due to strong word-of-mouth and its status as a "thinking person's" sci-fi film.
* **Domestic Home Video Sales:** Approximately **$20.6 million** in North America alone (breakdown: $14.2M from Blu-ray and $6.4M from DVD).
* **Digital/VOD:** While specific digital rental/purchase numbers are not public, it was a consistent top-performer on platforms like iTunes and Vudu throughout the 2017 awards season.
* **Streaming/TV Rights:** The film’s licensing deals with platforms (like Hulu and later Paramount+) and cable networks added significantly to its total revenue, though these private contracts are not publicly itemized.
---
### **2. Comparison to Budget & Profitability**
*Arrival* is cited as a textbook example of a "prestige" hit because its earnings far exceeded the traditional industry "break-even" threshold (usually 2.5x the production budget).
| Metric | Figure | Notes |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Budget-to-Box Office Ratio** | **~4.3x** | A ratio of 4.3 indicates the film was highly profitable before home media. |
| **Theatrical Multiplier (Legs)** | **4.18x** | This measures its domestic total against its $24M opening. High multipliers (anything >3x) indicate strong word-of-mouth. |
| **Distributor ROI (Paramount)** | **High** | Paramount's $20M acquisition of US/China rights yielded a $100M+ domestic gross, making it one of their most efficient investments of 2016. |
### **3. Why it Succeeded Financially**
* **Efficient Production:** Director Denis Villeneuve produced a visual scale that critics noted looked far more expensive than its $47M price tag (for comparison, *Interstellar* cost $165M and *The Martian* cost $108M).
* **Awards Season Bump:** The film was released in November and stayed in theaters for 17 weeks. After receiving **8 Academy Award nominations** (including Best Picture), it was re-expanded into over 1,000 theaters in early 2017, generating a late-stage revenue surge.
* **Counter-Programming:** It served as a successful alternative for adult audiences during a season dominated by blockbusters like *Doctor Strange* and *Fantastic Beasts*.