← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/10/2026 // SUBJECT: Design for Living (1933) film scenes Processing: 1m 31.4s
Source: Gemini 3.0 Flash + Search
Analysis: gemini-3-pro-preview
Timeline: Skipped
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
2 0 0 9
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film Design for Living (1933), which scenes have the most tension and why? Detail specific moments and what preceeded them.

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

In Ernst Lubitsch's Design for Living (1933), tension is primarily derived from the constant struggle between sexual desire, bohemian freedom, and the rigid social conventions of the era.

The following scenes are the most tense, detailed by their build-up and specific moments of conflict or intimacy.

1. The "Typewriter" Reunion (Tom and Gilda)

This is widely considered the most sexually charged scene in the film.

2. The "I Am No Gentleman" Scene (George and Gilda)

This scene marks the first time the trio’s "gentleman’s agreement" is shattered.

3. The "Tuxedo for Breakfast" Confrontation

This is the peak of the film's dramatic tension, as all three characters are forced to confront the reality of their triangle.

4. The "Animal, Vegetable, or Mineral" Party

The tension in this scene is social and comedic, representing the clash between the trio's wild nature and the "boring" reality of conventional life.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] Tom moves to London to oversee his play, leaving George and Gilda in Paris.
[2] Gilda and George move to a penthouse after George becomes a successful painter.
[3] Tom finds his old typewriter in the penthouse, which serves as a key prop for the scene.
[4] The dialogue 'It still rings' and 'Does it?' is accurate and famous for its sexual innuendo.
[5] This scene occurs in their original, smaller apartment before they move to the penthouse.
[6] The quote 'I am no gentleman' is accurate and marks the breach of the agreement.
[7] Tom is wearing a tuxedo, not pajamas. The scene is critically referred to as 'Tuxedo for Breakfast' precisely because he is wearing formal evening wear in the morning, implying he has not changed or slept.
[8] George's line 'It's hard to believe I loved you both!' is accurate.
[9] Tom and George crash the party in formal wear and hide in the bedroom.
[10] Gilda's line about being a 'trademark married to a slogan' is accurate.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Low
Chronological Order

The summary lists the 'Typewriter' Reunion (Scene 1) before the 'I Am No Gentleman' Breach (Scene 2), even though the Breach happens first in the film's timeline.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What is the significance of the 'Gentleman's Agreement' in Design for Living?
#02 How does the film Design for Living differ from the Noel Coward play?
#03 Explain the 'Lubitsch Touch' in the context of Design for Living.

#S SOURCES

wordpress.com wordpress.com wordpress.com wordpress.com wordpress.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)