← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/9/2026 // SUBJECT: Audience perception of characters in the film Notting Hill (1999) Processing: 1m 23.3s
Source: Gemini 3.0 Flash + Search
Analysis: gemini-3-pro-preview
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
0 1 0 10
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film Notting Hill (1999), which character does the audience root for, and which do they root against, and why (e.g. which of their actions cause the audience perception)?

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

In the film Notting Hill (1999), audience perception is split between a "fairy-tale" rooting for the central romance and a modern, more critical retrospective of the characters’ personal flaws. While the film is a beloved romantic comedy, certain actions by the leads cause audiences to oscillate between sympathy and frustration.

Characters the Audience Roots For

1. William Thacker (Hugh Grant)

The audience primarily roots for William because he represents the "everyman" or the "underdog." He is a humble, slightly bumbling travel bookstore owner whose life is quiet and unremarkable until he meets a superstar.

2. Spike (Rhys Ifans)

Spike is the "scene-stealer" and the eccentric heart of the film. Despite being messy and odd, the audience roots for him as the ultimate loyal friend.

3. Max and Bella (Tim McInnerny and Gina McKee)

This supporting couple is often cited as the "real" love story of the film.


Characters the Audience Roots Against

1. Anna Scott (Julia Roberts) — The Polarizing Lead

While the film intends for her to be the romantic lead, she is the character many modern audiences root against or find "insufferable."

2. Jeff King (Alec Baldwin)

Jeff is the stereotypical Hollywood antagonist.

3. The Paparazzi

The press functions as the primary non-human antagonist of the film.

4. The "Rude Diners"

In a notable restaurant scene, a group of loud, posh men talk crudely about Anna Scott’s appearance and career.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] Accurate quote from the film.
[2] In the scene, William mentions the birthday, but Anna initiates the idea of attending ('I could come'). William is surprised ('You could come?'). The summary implies he invited her, which is a minor inaccuracy in agency.
[3] Rufus is the shoplifter character played by Dylan Moran.
[4] William poses as a reporter from Horse & Hound magazine to interview Anna at the Ritz.
[5] Hugh Grant has explicitly criticized this scene in interviews (e.g., Vanity Fair, 2024), stating his character had 'no balls' for not stopping Anna.
[6] Spike admits to talking to people in a pub about Anna staying there, which leads to the leak. He did not do it maliciously for money, so 'accidentally' (or carelessly) is accurate.
[7] Max is frequently shown carrying Bella, reinforcing their bond.
[8] Jeff King (Alec Baldwin) is the boyfriend Anna conceals.
[9] William overhears Anna describe him as 'No one... just some guy' to her co-star Patrick Barlow (who plays the lead in the film-within-a-film).
[10] Jeff King mistakes William for a waiter when William helps clear the table.
[11] Anna approaches the table of rude men and embarrasses them by commenting on their 'small dicks' (implied/stated) and behavior.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Low
Spike's Leak Method

The summary says Spike 'accidentally' alerts the press. It would be more precise to say he 'carelessly' alerted them by gossiping in a pub, as 'accidentally' might imply a total misunderstanding rather than loose lips.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What was the specific insult Anna Scott used against the rude diners in Notting Hill?
#02 Did Hugh Grant improvise any lines in Notting Hill?
#03 Who played the shoplifter Rufus in Notting Hill?

#S SOURCES

youtube.com youtube.com unipd.it youtube.com tomsguide.com reddit.com wikipedia.org cinemablend.com awesomefilm.com youtube.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)