← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/15/2026 // SUBJECT: Audience perception of characters in I Am Legend (2007) Processing: 1m 25.3s
Source: Gemini 3.0 Flash + Search
Analysis: gemini-3-pro-preview
Timeline: Skipped
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
0 2 0 7
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film I Am Legend (2007), which character does the audience root for, and which do they root against, and why (e.g. which of their actions cause the audience perception)?

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

In the 2007 film I Am Legend, audience perception of "good" and "evil" is heavily influenced by the survivalist narrative and the specific version of the film watched (Theatrical vs. Alternate).

Characters the Audience Roots For

1. Robert Neville (Protagonist)

The audience primarily roots for Robert Neville because he is framed as the "last hope" for humanity.

2. Sam (Samantha the Dog)

Sam is arguably the most "rooted for" character in the film. As Neville’s only living companion, she represents his last link to his family and his remaining humanity.


Characters the Audience Roots Against

1. The Darkseekers (Specifically the Alpha Male)

In the theatrical version, the Darkseekers are portrayed as mindless, bloodthirsty monsters that have lost all human traits.


The Complex Shift: The Alternate Ending

The perception of these characters shifts significantly in the Alternate Ending (which is closer to the original Richard Matheson novel).

Summary Table

Character Audience Perception Primary Reason
Robert Neville Root For (Hero/Survivor) His loneliness, his grief, and his mission to save humanity.
Sam (Dog) Root For (Innocent) Her unwavering loyalty and the tragic nature of her death.
Alpha Male Root Against (Monster) Killing Sam and being the relentless "villain" of the theatrical cut.
Alpha Male Root For/Sympathize (Alternate) Revealed as a partner trying to rescue his kidnapped mate.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] Neville is the clear protagonist and audience surrogate for the majority of the film.
[2] Neville's interactions with mannequins, particularly 'Fred', are a key plot point establishing his loneliness and mental state.
[3] In the theatrical ending, Neville sacrifices himself with a grenade to save Anna, Ethan, and the cure.
[4] Sam is bitten by zombie dogs (infected dogs) while defending Neville during the snare trap sequence.
[5] Neville is forced to strangle/smother Sam after the virus takes hold and she attempts to bite him.
[6] The film strongly implies the Darkseekers moved the mannequin to set a trap, mirroring Neville's own tactics, though the actual movement is not shown on screen.
[7] In the alternate ending, the Alpha Male traces or smears a butterfly shape on the glass to communicate his connection to the female subject (who has a butterfly tattoo). This differs from the theatrical cut where cracks accidentally form the shape.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Low
Anna and Ethan

The summary omits Anna and Ethan as characters the audience roots for. While they appear late in the film, they represent the future of humanity and the success of Neville's mission, making them clear 'good guys' the audience supports.

Low
Religious Context of the Butterfly (Theatrical)

The summary mentions the butterfly in the alternate ending context but misses the specific religious/fate-based context of the butterfly in the theatrical cut (referencing Neville's daughter and God's plan), which adds to the 'why' the audience accepts his sacrifice.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What is the significance of the butterfly in I Am Legend theatrical vs alternate ending?
#02 Did the Darkseekers move the mannequin in I Am Legend?
#03 I Am Legend alternate ending explained

#S SOURCES

youtube.com collider.com reddit.com reddit.com youtube.com youtube.com quora.com ew.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)