| Errors | Missing | Unverified | Supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
In the 1988 Dutch cult classic Amsterdamned, the audience’s emotional investment is clearly divided between a charismatic, relatable hero and a brutal, shadowy antagonist.
The audience roots for Eric Visser (played by Huub Stapel) because he is written as a "blue-collar hero"—a man who is competent at his job but grounded by the everyday struggles of life.
The audience roots against the Maniac (the scuba-diving serial killer) primarily due to the sheer brutality and public nature of his crimes, though the film provides a tragic layer to his villainy in the finale.
At the film's climax, it is revealed that the killer is a former diver who was horribly disfigured and driven insane by uranium hexafluoride after his boss lied to him about the safety of a diving job. While this provides a moment of pity—highlighting that the real "villain" might be the corporate negligence that created him—his decision to murder innocent civilians ensures that the audience remains firmly on Visser’s side until the killer's eventual suicide.
The summary describes the Salvation Army worker as an 'innocent' victim, missing the film's dark irony that she is actually stealing the charity money. This 'sinful victim' trope is common in slasher films and affects audience rooting interest.
In Amsterdamned (1988), the audience roots for Detective Eric Visser (Huub Stapel), a relatable single father and 'blue-collar hero' who battles bureaucracy and performs a heroic speedboat chase. They root against the 'Amsterdam Maniac,' a disfigured scuba diver who brutally murders people in the canals. However, the film complicates the 'innocent victim' trope; for example, the Salvation Army worker victim is shown stealing donations, making her less sympathetic than the summary suggests. The audience is also led to root against the red herring, psychiatrist Martin Ruysdael, before the tragic reveal of the true killer's motivation (uranium poisoning).