Overlay: Financial performance of Ghost in the Shell (2017)

← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

Errors	Missing	Unverified	Supported
0	2	0	10

How were these counts calculated?

Missing (2)

Specific Marketing Costs: The summary mentions 'substantial costs' but could havomitted-detail Home Media Revenue: The summary mentions 'before factoring in home media' but coomitted-detail

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

How did the 2017 live-action Ghost in the Shell perform financially?

What a correct answer would look like:

The 2017 live-action Ghost in the Shell was a box office bomb. Against a production budget of $110 million (plus an estimated $140 million in marketing/P&A costs), the film grossed only $40.6 million domestically and $129.2 million internationally for a worldwide total of $169.8 million. Deadline estimated the film lost the studio at least $60 million, with losses potentially exceeding $100 million if production costs were higher than reported.

What the LLM said (errors and omissions annotated)

The 2017 live-action film, Ghost in the Shell, starring Scarlett Johansson, was a significant financial disappointment, particularly when judged against its production cost.

Here are the specific financial details (based on internal knowledge):

Production Budget: The film had a reported production budget of $110 million. This figure does not include the substantial costs of marketing and distribution.
Domestic Box Office (North America): The film performed poorly in the domestic market, earning approximately $40.5 million during its theatrical run.
International Box Office: The international gross was significantly higher than the domestic take, but still insufficient to cover costs. It earned approximately $129.2 million internationally.
Worldwide Box Office Total: The total worldwide gross for Ghost in the Shell was approximately $169.7 million.

Financial Analysis and Outcome:

To break even, a major studio film generally needs to earn about 2.5 to 3 times its production budget at the box office (to account for the exhibitor's cut, marketing costs, and distribution fees). Given the $110 million production budget, the film would have needed to earn roughly $275 million to $330 million just to break even after all costs were factored in.

Since the worldwide gross was only $169.7 million, the film generated substantial losses for Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks (which co-financed the project). The estimated financial loss for the studio on the theatrical release alone (before factoring in home media revenue) was widely reported to be in the range of $60 million to over $100 million, making it a major box office flop for the year.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] The film is widely cited as a box office bomb.

[2] Box Office Mojo and The Numbers list the production budget at $110 million.

[3] Marketing (P&A) costs were estimated to be around $140 million, separate from the production budget.

[4] Domestic gross was $40,563,557.

[5] International gross was $129,238,364.

[6] Worldwide gross was $169,801,921 (rounded to $169.8m).

[7] This is a standard industry rule of thumb for blockbusters.

[8] Mathematical application of the standard multiplier to the $110m budget.

[9] Paramount and DreamWorks were the primary financiers/distributors.

[10] Deadline reported a projected loss of at least $60 million, potentially over $100 million.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Low

Specific Marketing Costs

The summary mentions 'substantial costs' but could have specified the estimated $140 million P&A spend reported by Deadline.

Low

Home Media Revenue

The summary mentions 'before factoring in home media' but could have added that home media sales were approximately $13.1 million.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 What was the marketing budget for Ghost in the Shell 2017?

#02 How much did Ghost in the Shell 2017 make in China?

#03 Why did the 2017 Ghost in the Shell flop?

#S SOURCES

theplaylist.net gamespot.com youtube.com bombreport.com saturation.io saturation.io youtube.com movieweb.com medium.com wikipedia.org reddit.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

▼

The 2017 live-action film, *Ghost in the Shell*, starring Scarlett Johansson, was a significant financial disappointment, particularly when judged against its production cost. Here are the specific financial details (based on internal knowledge): 1. **Production Budget:** The film had a reported production budget of **$110 million**. This figure does not include the substantial costs of marketing and distribution. 2. **Domestic Box Office (North America):** The film performed poorly in the domestic market, earning approximately **$40.5 million** during its theatrical run. 3. **International Box Office:** The international gross was significantly higher than the domestic take, but still insufficient to cover costs. It earned approximately **$129.2 million** internationally. 4. **Worldwide Box Office Total:** The total worldwide gross for *Ghost in the Shell* was approximately **$169.7 million**. **Financial Analysis and Outcome:** To break even, a major studio film generally needs to earn about **2.5 to 3 times** its production budget at the box office (to account for the exhibitor's cut, marketing costs, and distribution fees). Given the $110 million production budget, the film would have needed to earn roughly **$275 million to $330 million** just to break even after all costs were factored in. Since the worldwide gross was only **$169.7 million**, the film generated substantial losses for Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks (which co-financed the project). The estimated financial loss for the studio on the theatrical release alone (before factoring in home media revenue) was widely reported to be in the range of **$60 million to over $100 million**, making it a major box office flop for the year.

OVERLAY REPORT