← Return to Rewinder: AI Analysis of AI Analysis of Film

OVERLAY REPORT

1/16/2026 // SUBJECT: Audience perception of characters in Watership Down (1978 film) Processing: 1m 42.7sfull-failings-1
Source: Gemini 3.0 Flash + Search
Analysis: gemini-3-pro-preview
Timeline: Skipped
EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY
Errors Missing Unverified Supported
2 0 0 6
How were these counts calculated?

#Q ORIGINAL QUESTION

Regarding the film Watership Down (1978), which character does the audience root for, and which do they root against, and why (e.g. which of their actions cause the audience perception)?

#M ANNOTATED LLM RESPONSE

In the 1978 film Watership Down, audience perception is shaped by a stark contrast between a "natural" struggle for survival and "unnatural" tyranny. Viewers primarily root for the small band of refugees led by Hazel, while rooting against the totalitarian General Woundwort.

Characters the Audience Roots For

The audience roots for the protagonists not just because they are the "heroes," but because their leadership is based on mutual respect, empathy, and the collective desire for freedom.

Characters the Audience Roots Against

The "villains" in Watership Down are rooted against because they represent different forms of corruption—either through apathy or active cruelty.

Summary of Perceptions

Character Audience Sentiment Key Reason
Hazel Root For Selfless leadership and strategic empathy.
Fiver Root For Vulnerability and the burden of truth.
Bigwig Root For Transition from a bully to a loyal, heroic defender.
Woundwort Root Against Fascistic cruelty and rejection of peace.
Cowslip Root Against Moral cowardice and complicity in death.

#F CORRECTION FEED (CLICK TO SEARCH)

[1] Hazel correctly goes to Nuthanger Farm to chew the dog's leash, releasing it to save the warren.
[2] This specific event occurs in the original novel (Chapter 'The Black Rabbit of Inlé') but is omitted from the 1978 film. In the film, Hazel's climactic sacrifice is releasing the dog; he does not have a bargaining dialogue with the Black Rabbit during the siege. He only meets the Black Rabbit at the very end of the film when he dies of old age.
[3] Fiver's vision of the field covered in blood is a key early scene in the film.
[4] This is a direct and accurate quote from the film (and book).
[5] Kehaar attacks the Efrafans during the escape from Efrafa (the boat scene). While he is absent from the final siege at Watership Down, his intervention at Efrafa is a major plot point.
[6] In the 1978 film, Woundwort brutally kills Blackavar (tearing his throat out) just before the final siege. This is a film-exclusive event; in the book, Blackavar survives.
[7] Cowslip's warren (the Warren of the Snares) is correctly described as a place where rabbits are fed by a farmer in exchange for occasional deaths in snares.

#O MISSED POINTS & OVERSIGHTS

Medium
Hazel's specific film climax

The summary incorrectly attributes the book's metaphysical climax (bargaining with the Black Rabbit) to the film. In the film, Hazel's heroism is grounded in the physical action of releasing the dog.

#C RELATED QUERIES

#01 Does Hazel offer his life to the Black Rabbit in the 1978 film?
#02 How does Blackavar die in the Watership Down movie vs book?

#S SOURCES

wordpress.com fandom.com seeingthingssecondhand.com substack.com wikipedia.org substack.com wikipedia.org wikiquote.org fatherirenaeuswilliams.com fandom.com moviemistakes.com

#R ORIGINAL AI RESPONSE

#A DIRECT ANSWER (VERIFIED ANALYSIS)