| Errors | Missing | Unverified | Supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Counts based on original analysis categories (not yet classified).
Errors = Critical Errors + Imprecisions
Missing = Critical Omissions + Notable Gaps
The financial trajectory of Fight Club (1999) is one of the most famous examples in Hollywood of a film that failed "on paper" during its theatrical run but became a massive financial asset through its afterlife as a cult classic.
Initially, Fight Club was considered a box office disappointment.
The Gap: Studios typically receive about 50% of the box office gross (the "rentals" paid by theaters). For Fight Club, Fox’s share from the theatrical run was roughly $55 million. This did not even cover the $63M+ production budget, let alone the tens of millions spent on marketing.
The film's true financial success happened in the home video market, where it became one of the most successful titles in 20th Century Fox’s history.
Summary Table:
| Category | Amount (Approx.) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $63,000,000 |
| Theatrical Box Office | $100,853,753 |
| Home Video Rentals | $55,000,000+ |
| Physical Units Sold | 6,000,000+ |
| Current Status | Highly Profitable (Cult Classic) |
No oversights detected.
The AI Summary is highly accurate and comprehensive. It correctly identifies the production budget ($63-65M), the specific salaries for Pitt ($17.5M) and Norton ($2.5M), and the disappointing theatrical box office ($37M Domestic / $100.8M Worldwide). It accurately describes the film's massive post-theatrical success, citing the 6 million+ units sold and $55M in rental revenue that pushed the film into profitability within 18 months. The context regarding Bill Mechanic's firing and the Starbucks cup motif is also factually supported.