The Antarctic Setting in Horror The Thing (1982)

The Antarctic setting in horror cinema is older than The Thing (1982) but smaller than the Antarctic setting in adventure or expedition cinema. Antarctica is the most reliably hostile environment for narrative film — no native population, no neighbors, weeks of darkness in winter, temperatures incompatible with human life — and the films that have used it as a horror setting almost without exception use the same structural premise: a small isolated group, a sealed location, a threat that exploits the isolation.

The H.P. Lovecraft inheritance

H.P. Lovecraft's At the Mountains of Madness (1936, Astounding Stories) is the foundational text of Antarctic horror in English. The novella follows an American Antarctic expedition that discovers a hidden city of pre-human alien architecture under a mountain range; the survivors return with a story the world refuses to believe. John W. Campbell's Who Goes There? (1938) was published two years later in the same magazine and inherits Lovecraft's premise without his cosmic-horror framing — the Campbell story uses the Antarctic setting for a paranoid-containment plot rather than a cosmic-revelation plot.

"Lovecraft's Antarctica is a place where the world is older than you knew. Campbell's Antarctica is a place where you cannot know who you are with. The two writers split the territory: cosmic horror went one way, paranoid horror went the other. Carpenter's film is the mature form of Campbell's branch." — China Miéville, The Guardian (2011 introduction to a Penguin Classics Lovecraft edition)

The 1951 Hawks/Nyby relocation

The 1951 Thing from Another World relocated Campbell's Antarctic camp to an Arctic military post, partly to make the threat film-makable in actual northern locations and partly to make the setting consonant with the Cold War premise of a U.S. military post on the Soviet flank. The relocation worked at the box office but cost the picture some of Campbell's structural argument — the Arctic post is a military installation, accessible by air, in regular contact with Washington. Campbell's Big Magnet is unreachable. See The Hawks-Nyby Original (1951).

What the 1982 Thing does with the setting

Carpenter's 1982 film returns to Campbell's Antarctic setting and uses the setting structurally rather than as backdrop. The radio is dead from beat 4 on. Helicopter rotors are sabotaged in beat 18. The storm is overhead from beat 16 to beat 40. Once the men understand what they are dealing with, the setting is the reason they cannot escape, and the setting is the reason the post-midpoint approach makes sense — the cold itself is a tool the Thing cannot survive any more easily than the men can. See Plot Structure (The Thing) on the wind-down.

"Antarctica is the third character in The Thing. The first two are MacReady and the Thing. The third is the cold. The cold is what wins the picture." — Anne Billson, Sight & Sound (2010s)

The other major Antarctic horror films

The Antarctic-horror canon is small. The principal entries since 1982 are:

  • Wolfgang Reitherman, The Last Place on Earth (TV miniseries, 1985) — historical drama rather than horror, but established the visual grammar later Antarctic horror would inherit.
  • John Carpenter, The Thing (1982) — the canonical text.
  • Larry Fessenden, The Last Winter (2006) — Arctic rather than Antarctic, but in clear conversation with The Thing.
  • Frank Marshall, Eight Below (2006) — adventure rather than horror.
  • Matthijs van Heijningen Jr., The Thing (2011) — see The 2011 Prequel.
  • Joe Penna, Arctic (2018) — Arctic survival.
  • Antonio Campos, The Devil All the Time (2020) — not Antarctic, but uses the same isolated-northern-setting horror grammar.
  • Joe LaTruglio, et al., Hold the Dark (2018) — Alaska, but in the Antarctic-horror tradition.

The list is short because the production logistics are extreme. The 1982 picture's Stewart, B.C., and Universal sound-stage shoot is closer to feasible than an actual Antarctic shoot would be; later Antarctic-set horror films almost without exception shoot in Norway, Iceland, or the Canadian north and grade for Antarctica in post.

Why the setting works for horror

The Antarctic setting works for horror specifically because it converts ordinary genre constraints into structural constraints. A horror film usually has to invent reasons why the protagonists cannot leave: a phone line cut, a road blocked, a sheriff who will not believe them. Antarctica supplies all of those reasons by default and supplies several more: no neighbors, no rescue, no daylight in winter, no ground transport, no native wildlife, no possibility of running. The film does not have to spend any narrative energy on isolation; isolation is the setting.

"Antarctica is the laziest possible setting for a horror film, in the sense that the genre's hardest job — convincing the audience the protagonists cannot leave — is done before the script begins. That is why the genre keeps returning to it. Carpenter's film is the cleanest demonstration." — Mark Kermode, The Guardian (2002)

Sources